Theme 6

The first paper I've chosen is Construction of Values in Online and Offline Dating Discourses: Comparing Presentational and Articulated Rhetorics of Relationship Seeking. It is written by Jimmie Manning. The research paper was publiced 9 october 2013 in the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communucation which has an impact factor of 1.778.

Which qualitative method or methods are used in the paper? Which are the benefits and limitations of using these methods?

In this study there were 30 participants in this study were active members of a commercial dating website. The participants did interviews with the researchers about them self and their dating profile. The benefits of using a qualitative study is that its gives the researchers deeper understanding of an issue. It's also a good way to explore a new field in science. But its also time consuming and the results cant really be generalize since there where to few respondents to the survey.

What did you learn about qualitative methods from reading the paper?

The researchers did use the first four questions about how the individual was trying to shape and market their identity their dating site. The fifth question worked as a validity check where the researchers asked the individual about the choices they made in writing their advertisements. Together the individual the were asked to guided them through every element on the profile.

Which are the main methodological problems of the study? How could the use of the qualitative method or methods have been improved?

They only did one interview with each individual. The results only represent the opinions of the people in the studies at only one given time.  Their priority's and wishes for a partner could maybe change after the first date etc. The sampling was also just done using the snowball method

Briefly explain to a first year university student what a case study is.

Its a research strategy where the focus is on analyzing a single case or multiple cases.

The goal with the research is to understanding the dynamics present within a single setting. Both qualitative and quantitative methods could be used when doing a case study.

Paper: The Presence of Hyperlinks on Social Network Sites: A Case Study of Cyworld in Korea from the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communucation

Use the "Process of Building Theory from Case Study Research" (Eisenhardt, summarized in Table 1) to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of your selected paper.

The goal is to determine to which  extent hyperlinks appear within user-submitted comments on Korean social network service Cyworld. The data was collected from 130 Korean National Assembly Members by using software that did a copy the profiles each day during April 2008 - June 2009. When the data sampling was done they did continue on with the analyzing of data.

It feels like the final conclusions are well connected to the data they found in the research.

Theme 5: Reflection

This week we had two lectures on the topic of design research.
The first one was Ylvas lecture was about her research paper we read last week.

According to Ylva the actDress is a way of physical programming on robots.
However the system is limited to at most change the robots behavior more than adding something new to the product. According to Ylva the main application she could think of today would probably to start with toys.  More interesting was the concept Ylva brought up about was the more industrial aspects of the concept. The industrial company ABB have been looking for was to visualize a industrial robots state in a easy way to humans.

The robots used in the research where at the time (Pleo and Roomba) was very new and exciting. Ylva pointed out that if the research had been done today another technoligy might have been used.

On Haibos lecture he talked about how its important to clearly define the problem that needs to be solved. The greatness of the solution is correlates to how good the problem is defined. This is something that is necessary for an idea to become "great". Haibos lecture was more focused on how ideas could be turned into a commercial product. This was quite the opposite from Ylvas presentation where the commercial application of the idea was more "fuzzy" and not so clear. 

Theme 5

Fernaeus, Y. & Jacobsson, M. (2009). Comics, Robots, Fashion and Programming: outlining the concept of actDresses. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction. New York: ACM.

This paper is about how physical languages can be used to controlling and programming robotic consumer products.  By using pieces of clothing and the sign system used in comics to control the behavior of the robots. I like the idea of trying to bring a balance between appearance and action by using clothing. Many devices today do not even have a display or any other visual feedback to the user. Instead you have to rely on some complicated instruction manual. 

By using this physical languages the barriers of technology adoption for children, seniors etc might be lowered. Sometimes people that are not used with technology are afraid to experiment and learn by doing, therefore something like clothing could be a solution to overcoming these barriers.  But to find really good and logical applications for the "actDresses"might take a while. But I still think it has a lot of potential.

Question: Is there any technology today that would benefit from actDresses?

What role will prototypes play in research?

By using prototypes some abstract or complicated ideas can be visualized and evaluated at a early stage. The iteration process becomes much simplified if there is a prototype early in the research. 

What are characteristics and limitations of prototypes?

Prototypes makes evaluation and feedback becomes easier to come by. Errors can also be detected much earlier. It can also help the group working on the prototype to make sure they are all aiming for the same goal. Limitation is that creating the prototype might take longer than expected.The different iteration of a prototype might only refine the product, and the final product might only be a incrementally better than the first version.

Theme 4:Reflection

This week have been about quantitative and qualitative research. We have been discussing the benefits and limitation of the two research methods.

During the seminar we presented our research papers within a smaller groups and picked one that we wanted to investigate more closely. Some of the papers did not really have any clear result because the target group were too small for the results to be generalized in any way.

We decided to go with a research paper about how people in the insurance industry in Greece uses social media at work. It was interesting analyze the different key factors leading up to the result. Some variables did not affect the results (age was one for example). The researchers came to the conclusion that 2/3 of the people that participated in the study used social media at work and according to the employees it improved the productivity at work. The problem for me with the study is that people might justify their bad behavior by saying its adds value to the company. Its like asking if the coffee machine is adding productivity at the work. I might say it does. But if I spend ten minutes at it every hour it might be the opposite. This is also quite hard to measure.

During this week lecture we not only discussed the two methods but also how to construct a quantitative research. We got divided into small groups and played a game. I really enjoyed the lecture and the discussions

Theme 4

Research paper:

Internet Technology and Social Capital:How the Internet Affects Seniors’ Social Capital and Wellbeing (Sum, S., Mathews, Mark. R., Pourghasem, M. and Hughes, I. (2008)

Published in: Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (19 NOV 2009)

The research paper is about  the relationships between Internet use and older people’s social capital and wellbeing. According to the researchers internet can both help and harm seniors. Using the Internet can be helpful for older adults if they are aware how they use it.

The data was collected through an online survey. 222 Australian Internet users aged 55 years or older responded to the survey. Participants were recruited through search engines, through advertisements, and through online community interest groups. By using a quantitative method on the internet the researchers could reach the target group in their study by using the medium they wanted to investigate.

Benefits to this method are that handling of the data becomes easier, extending access to participants, anonymity, timesaving  and increased accuracy through the removal of researcher’s transcription and interference. Limitations are that the people answered the questionnaire are not representative of the general population. Its also inappropriate for studies where a large proportion of the target population may not have access to the Internet technology. In this case, just to find the survey you’ll had to have rather good understanding about using the internet. The target group were also quite large, spanning from 55 years or older. So their life and use of internet might be very different since some of the people in the survey probably still work and use computers and internet in their daily work. While others have been retired for a long time.

The survey used  data about general demographic, age, gender, marital status, education, and population density of the place of residence. Control variables were questions on personality and self-perception of health.

Physical activity, stress, and self-reported upper respiratory tract infection. Benefits, limitations of quantitative vs. qualitative methods.

This paper is about if there is any connection between upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and physical activity and perceived stress.  They conducted a survey on 1509 persons between the age of 20 and 60 during 4 month. The data was collected using a questionnaire that were sent out in emails each week.The results where that physical activity leads to a lower risk of respiratory tract infection and that highly stressed people would benefit more from physical activity than people with lower stress levels.

1. Which are the benefits and limitations of using quantitative methods?

When using quantitative methods its possible to test a hypothesis with statistic data.

That way researchers have a tool to prove a theory. Quantitative methods can at the same show that the hypothesis don't really correspond with the data collected.  

The results from quantitative methods depends on how the researchers decides how to collect and use the data. If its not done correctly the results may not be representative for the group examined. Its also important to remember that everything cannot be quantified.

2. Which are the benefits and limitations of using qualitative methods?

Qualitative methods can give researchers a deeper understanding of a issue thats not possible to obtain with quantitative methods. Limitations is for example that the analyse of the data is time consuming. Its also hard to generalize the results due to the few participants.

Theme 3: Reflection

This weeks seminars have given the chance to discuss the scientific papers and journals that we had chosen. Our selected papers covered a broad range of topics in the field of media technology which represented the journals in the field.  During the seminar we here divided in smaller groups and discussed our selected papers and then presented one paper for the rest of the class.

Our groups paper of choice was about how search engines might shape information by ranking large and popular websites higher than smaller sites and therefore making some trends about a specific topic more prominent [1]. Little work has previously been done about this topic.

The authors had problems with coming to any real conclusion about the issue and did not really give any clear answers. This was something that we discussed and even though it seems like the paper didn't add anything in terms of results, the method of the research could still be relevant to others who might want to do a similar study in the future. That way a study can still be a part of the scientific advancement of  even though there is any real conclusions.

When analyzing the papers it was quite hard to be able to know which type of Gregors different types of theory it really was. It was more the case on how we interpreted Gregor’s definitions and our subjective understanding of theory.We also discussed what theory really is, how we can define it and what science that can be accepted as something “true”. The conclusion of this was that for a theory to be established it need to pass through several researchers functioning as gatekeepers. When the majority of experts in the field accepts the the theory it can be accepted as true. Therefore its not about what the majority of the public feels about a theory.

1. Li, N., Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D. and Scheufele, D. A. (2013), Channeling Science Information Seekers' Attention? A Content Analysis of Top-Ranked vs. Lower-Ranked Sites in Google. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12043

Theme 3

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Impact Factor: 1.778

This journal is focused on social science research on computer-mediated communication on the Internet. It have been published continuously since 1995.

Example of articles in the journal:

Are We All Online Content Creators Now? Web 2.0 and Digital Divides

An Analysis of Language in University Students' Text Messages

I’ve picked a article from the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication about

Channeling Science Information Seekers' Attention? A Content Analysis of Top-Ranked vs. Lower-Ranked Sites in Google (published online 14 Nov 2013).

The authors to the article have conducted a content analysis regarding the search results on Google about nanotechnology. According to them are there are not enough empirical research if search engines shapes information by making big popular websites even more popular while discriminating others. And this is also causing a risk of possible skew information sources. According to the authors Googles most high ranked results where the technical, environmental, and risk related aspects of nanotechnology. The more low ranked search results hade instead significantly different themes.

1. Briefly explain to a first year student what theory is, and what theory is not.

Theory is for example a set of hypotheses that are logically linked together into a coherent explanation of some aspect of reality. Which individually or interconnected provide any empirical support for the theory. References, data, variables, diagrams and hypotheses etc on they own are not theory but they can be a part of a theory.

2. Describe the major theory or theories that are used in your selected paper. Which theory type (see Table 2 in Gregor) can the theory or theories be characterized as?

In my selected paper they are using using “Analysis” as the theory type.  Since their results came from computer-assisted sampling of the Google search results over one and a half year, a lot of their results is dependent on how this sampling was done. They don't really go beyond analysis and description therefore they spend the majority of the discussion on just “analysis theory”.

3. Which are the benefits and limitations of using the selected theory or theories?

The benefits of using “analysis theory” is that it tries to avoid any speculation and instead rely on the actual facts that are present and available to the reader.  This makes it more easy to follow the author's arguments since everything is more based on facts than speculation, but it can also make the paper feel a bit too simplistic.